How to
7 Programmatic Video Advertising Platforms To Try in 2025
10 min read
5 Tested TvScientific Competitors for TV Advertising
If you’re searching for TVScientific competitors, you're likely searching for enhanced targeting, competitive pricing, or more precise attribution tracking for your CTV campaigns.
Maybe you’ve used TVScientific and felt it wasn’t the right fit. Or perhaps you're researching platforms that offer pricing transparency.
So, where should you look next?
In this blog, you’ll find:
- 5 tested TVScientific competitors with real user feedback.
- A side-by-side comparison table for easy decision-making.
- Pros, cons, and pricing—so you know what to expect.
- A simple breakdown of how each platform compares to TVScientific.
By the end, you’ll have everything you need to make an informed choice. Let’s begin.
Top 5 TVScientific Competitors: Quick Look
| Feature | Vibe.co | StackAdapt | MNTN | Basis | Simpli.fi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best For | Self-serve, easy CTV ads | Multi-channel programmatic DSP | Automated performance TV ads | Enterprise ad buying & automation | Geo-targeted & local programmatic ads |
| Ad Channels | CTV, OTT, streaming apps | CTV, Display, Native, Video, Audio | CTV, streaming platforms | CTV, Display, Mobile, Social | CTV, OTT, Display, Geo-fencing |
| Targeting | Behavioral & interest-based | AI-powered audience segmentation | Lookalike & demo-based targeting | Cross-channel segmentation | Addressable geofencing |
| Attribution | Real-time campaign insights | AI-driven conversion tracking | Cross-device attribution | Advanced analytics & reporting | Foot traffic & sales tracking |
| Ease of Use | Beginner- friendly UI | Requires DSP knowledge | Simple, automated setup | Built for agencies & teams | Easy, scalable campaigns |
| Pricing | Transparent CPM pricing | Custom, spend-based | Flat-rate CPM | Enterprise custom pricing | Varies by campaign |
Overview of TVScientific
TVScientific is a platform that helps businesses run ads on Connected TV (CTV) with a focus on measurable results. It combines the broad reach of TV advertising with the precise tracking found in digital marketing.
Here are a few key features of TVScientific:
- TVScientific offers detailed dashboards, allowing you to monitor ad performance closely.
- The platform uses advanced data to help you reach specific audiences, aiming to make your ads more effective.
- TVScientific collaborates with well-known channels and streaming services, providing access to a wide range of viewers.
Why Consider Alternatives to TVScientific?
TVScientific is a strong option for performance-driven CTV advertising, but it may not be the best fit for everyone.
If you're looking for more flexibility, advanced automation, or better campaign management features, you might want to explore other options.
Some advertisers have found that certain features are missing in TVScientific, which are available in competitors like Vibe.co, StackAdapt, MNTN, Basis, and Simpli.fi.
Here are some key reasons why you might consider an alternative:
1. Limited Advertising Channels: TVScientific mainly focuses on Connected TV (CTV) ads and does not support display, native, audio, or social ads like other platforms.
- StackAdapt and Basis allow businesses to run ads across multiple channels, including display, video, and social.
- If you want to run ads across different platforms, TVScientific may not be the best choice.
2. No Verified Customer Reviews: TVScientific has no verified user reviews on G2, Trustpilot, or Capterra, making it difficult for new users to assess real-world experiences.
- Most competitors like MNTN, StackAdapt, and Simpli.fi have multiple user reviews available for comparison.
3. Limited Third-Party Integrations: There are difficulties integrating TVScientific with external analytics tools, CRM platforms, and third-party ad networks.
- Some advertisers struggle to sync campaign performance data with Google Analytics or independent attribution tools.
4. Lack of Transparent Pricing: Unlike some competitors that clearly list pricing or provide an estimator, TVScientific’s pricing remains opaque, requiring users to contact sales.
If TVScientific doesn’t fully meet your needs, it’s worth exploring alternatives that offer more flexibility.
Let’s start with Vibe.co, a platform known for its user-friendly approach to CTV advertising.
1. Vibe.co: Best for Simple and Budget-Friendly TV Advertising
Vibe.co is a self-serve platform that makes it easy for businesses to launch TV ads on streaming platforms.
Unlike TVScientific, which focuses on AI-driven performance tracking, Vibe.co is designed for advertisers who want a straightforward, cost-effective way to run TV ads.
If you’re a small or medium-sized business (SMB), a brand new to CTV advertising, or someone looking for clear pricing and an easy setup, Vibe.co might be a better option than TVScientific.
Here are a few key features of Vibe.co:
- You can start a TV ad campaign in 5 minutes.
- Begin with as little as a $50 daily budget, or $500 lifetime budget, making it affordable for various business sizes.
- You can advertise on over 500 streaming apps and TV channels, ensuring your ads reach a broad audience.
- You can easily target your ads based on location, interests, languages, demographics, and purchase intent to reach the right viewers.
Pros of Vibe.co:
- User-Friendly Interface: Users find Vibe.co easy to navigate. One reviewer said, "Very easy to use platform for a first time CTV advertiser like myself, being able to dial in demographics and platforms….”
- Responsive Customer Support: The support team is praised for being helpful. A user mentioned, "The team is helpful, supportive, and are there to offer support along the way."
- Transparent Pricing: Vibe.co has a clear and upfront pricing model with no hidden fees, making it easy for advertisers to plan their budgets. However, TVScientific does not publicly disclose its pricing, requiring potential customers to contact sales for a quote.
Cons of Vibe.co:
- Limited Advanced Features: Some users find that while Vibe.co is easy to use, accessing certain advanced features takes extra effort. You can view the data you need, but it might require more steps than expected.
- Reporting Dashboard Limitations: A few users have mentioned that the reporting dashboard could offer more customization options.
Vibe.co Pricing
Vibe.co offers clear pricing with no hidden fees.
- Minimum Budget: Start with a $500 total budget or a $50 daily budget.
- Cost Per View: Prices begin at $0.02 per view, making it cost-effective for businesses of all sizes.
Vibe.co vs. TVScientific
| Feature | Vibe.co | TVScientific |
|---|---|---|
| Campaign Setup Time | Start in 5 minutes | Not specified |
| Budget Flexibility | Start with $50 daily or $500 lifetime budget | Not specified |
| Ad Inventory | Access to 500+ streaming apps and TV channels | Focuses on CTV |
| Audience Targeting | Location, interests, demographics, purchase intent | Data-driven targeting |
| User Interface | Simple and easy to use | Not specified |
| Customer Support | Responsive and helpful | Not specified |
| Advanced Features | May lack some advanced functionalities | Focus on data-driven performance |
| Reporting Dashboard | Could offer more customization | Not specified |
If you want a simple, self-serve TV ad platform with clear pricing and an easy setup, Vibe.co is a better choice than TVScientific.
It’s perfect for small businesses and advertisers who don’t want a complicated process.
However, if you need more advanced AI-driven optimization and in-depth performance tracking, TVScientific may be a better option.
Next, let's look at StackAdapt, another alternative that offers multi-channel programmatic advertising beyond just CTV.
2. StackAdapt: Best for Multi-Channel Programmatic Advertising
StackAdapt is a programmatic advertising platform that helps businesses run ads across various channels, including native, display, video, connected TV (CTV), audio, in-game, and digital out-of-home (DOOH).
Unlike TVScientific, which focuses mainly on CTV advertising, StackAdapt offers a broader range of advertising options, making it ideal for businesses aiming to reach audiences through multiple channels.
Here are a few key features of StackAdapt:
- Multi-Channel Advertising: Run campaigns across native, display, video, CTV, audio, in-game, and DOOH platforms, allowing for a comprehensive advertising strategy.
- Advanced Targeting: Utilize demographic, behavioral, and contextual targeting to reach specific audiences effectively.
- AI-Powered Optimization: Leverage artificial intelligence to enhance ad placements and improve campaign performance.
- User-Friendly Interface: Manage campaigns easily with an intuitive dashboard that simplifies the advertising process.
Pros of StackAdapt:
- High-Quality Support: Users appreciate StackAdapt's responsive and knowledgeable support team. One reviewer noted, "StackAdapt is an amazing option for Self Service users. The platform is transparent, very easy to use, and has a very helpful support team."
- Multi-Channel Advertising Capabilities: While TVScientific primarily focuses on Connected TV (CTV) advertising. StackAdapt enables advertisers to run campaigns across various channels, including native, display, video, CTV, audio, in-game, and digital out-of-home (DOOH). This multi-channel approach allows businesses to reach a broader audience and diversify their advertising strategies.
- Ease of Use: The platform's intuitive design makes it accessible for users, even those new to programmatic advertising.
Cons of StackAdapt:
- Reporting Dashboard is not robust: Some advertisers find that StackAdapt's reporting tools could be more flexible. While the platform provides useful data, users feel that the dashboard reporting could be far more robust.
- Takes Time to Learn for New Users: Beginners might find StackAdapt's advanced features overwhelming at first. Some users mention that it takes time to fully understand how to optimize campaigns effectively.
- Occasional Slow Performance: A few users report that the platform can lag, especially when handling large campaign reports. This can make it frustrating for advertisers managing multiple campaigns at once.
StackAdapt Pricing
StackAdapt does not publicly disclose its pricing details.
To obtain specific information tailored to your advertising needs, it's recommended to request a demo or contact their sales team directly.
StackAdapt vs. TVScientific
| Feature | StackAdapt | TVScientific |
|---|---|---|
| Advertising Channels | Multi-channel: native, display, video, CTV, audio, in-game, DOOH | Primarily CTV-focused |
| Targeting Options | Demographic, behavioral, contextual | Data-driven targeting |
| AI Optimization | Yes | Yes |
| User Interface | Intuitive and user-friendly | Not specified |
| Customer Support | Responsive and knowledgeable | Not specified |
| Pricing Transparency | Requires contact for details | Not publicly disclosed |
In summary, if you're seeking a versatile advertising platform that supports multiple channels and offers advanced targeting with AI optimization, StackAdapt is a strong alternative to TVScientific.
Its user-friendly interface and high-quality customer support make it suitable for businesses aiming for a comprehensive programmatic advertising approach.
3. MNTN – Best for Performance-Driven CTV Advertising
MNTN is a Connected TV (CTV) advertising platform designed to help brands drive measurable conversions, revenue, and site visits through performance-driven TV campaigns.
Unlike TVScientific, which focuses primarily on data-driven CTV advertising, MNTN offers a user-friendly, self-serve platform that simplifies the process of launching and managing CTV campaigns, making it accessible even for businesses without extensive marketing teams.
Here are some of the key features of MNTN:
- Automated Optimization: MNTN's platform automatically optimizes campaigns to drive stronger results, adjusting in real-time to enhance performance.
- Premium Inventory Access: Advertisers gain access to over 150 premium streaming networks, ensuring ads reach high-quality audiences across various platforms.
- Creative Solutions: Through offerings like Creative-as-a-Subscription™, MNTN provides accessible solutions for creating high-quality CTV ads, even for brands without existing video assets.
- Comprehensive Reporting Suite: Users can monitor campaign performance through customizable dashboards and integrations with tools like Google Analytics, facilitating informed decision-making.
Pros of MNTN:
- User-Friendly Platform: Users appreciate MNTN's intuitive interface, which simplifies campaign setup and management. One reviewer noted, "MNTN's platform has been very easy to navigate and use."
- Responsive Customer Support: The customer support team is recognized for being helpful and knowledgeable. A user shared, "The customer support is also very helpful. Our Customer Success Manager is very knowledgeable and consistently provides recommendations."
- Effective Performance Tracking: Advertisers value the clear reporting and accurate household targeting, which aid in assessing campaign effectiveness.
Cons of MNTN:
- Setting up creatives can be difficult: Some users find the creative setup process to be less intuitive, especially for those used to other ad platforms.
- API integration support is limited: Advertisers who need API access for custom reporting have faced challenges due to lack of integration support.
- Platform can be slow at times: Some advertisers experience lagging issues, especially when comparing data from previous periods.
MNTN Pricing:
MNTN does not publicly disclose its pricing information.
Interested advertisers are encouraged to contact MNTN directly to request a demo and obtain detailed pricing based on their specific needs and campaign goals.
MNTN vs. TVScientific
| Feature | MNTN | TVScientific |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Brands seeking user-friendly CTV advertising solutions | Advertisers focusing on data-driven CTV campaigns |
| Ad Channels | Connected TV | Connected TV |
| Creative Support | Offers Creative-as-a-Subscription™ for ad creation | Requires advertisers to provide their own creatives |
| Audience Targeting | Matches data across 99% of U.S. households for precise targeting | Utilizes AI-powered audience segmentation |
| Reporting Tools | Customizable dashboards with Google Analytics integration | Provides performance analytics with a focus on attribution |
| Platform Complexity | Simplified, self-serve platform suitable for businesses without extensive marketing teams | May require more hands-on management and expertise |
| Pricing Transparency | Pricing details available upon request | Pricing details available upon request |
MNTN is a great alternative to TVScientific for businesses that want an easy-to-use CTV ad platform with built-in creative support and automated campaign optimization.
On the other hand, if you need AI-driven attribution tracking and a more data-heavy approach, TVScientific may be a better fit.
Now that we’ve covered MNTN, let’s move on to Basis, another competitor that offers programmatic advertising solutions beyond just CTV.
4. Basis – Best for Cross-Channel Advertising and Automated Campaign Management
Basis is a digital advertising platform that enables businesses to manage programmatic, direct, search, and social media campaigns from a single interface.
Unlike TVScientific, which focuses solely on Connected TV (CTV) advertising, Basis offers a unified solution for advertisers seeking to streamline workflows and run ads across multiple channels.
Let’s look at a few key features of Basis:
- Multi-Channel Campaign Management: Run ads on CTV, display, video, native, search, and social media within one platform, providing a broader range of advertising options compared to TVScientific's CTV-only focus.
- AI-Powered Optimization: Utilize machine learning to analyze performance data and adjust bids, enhancing campaign efficiency across different channels.
- Comprehensive Reporting and Analytics: Access customizable dashboards to monitor campaign performance and integrate with third-party analytics tools for a holistic view.
- Automated Workflow Features: Reduce manual tasks by automating campaign setup, reporting, and optimization, allowing teams to focus more on strategy.
Pros of Basis:
- User-Friendly Interface: Users find Basis's dashboard clean and organized, simplifying campaign management. One reviewer noted, "Basis DSP is one of the most intuitive and easy to use DSPs that I've used."
- Comprehensive Training and Support: The platform offers extensive training resources and responsive customer support, easing the learning process for new users.
Cons of Basis:
- Limited Advanced Features for Large-Scale Campaigns: Some users feel that Basis may not offer the depth of advanced features required for very large or complex campaigns.
- Managed Service Limitations: A few users have noted that the platform's managed service options could be more flexible to better suit individual client needs.
Basis Pricing
Basis offers tailored pricing based on the specific needs and scale of the advertiser. Interested businesses are encouraged to contact Basis directly to obtain detailed pricing information.
Basis vs. TVScientific
| Feature | Basis | TVScientific |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Advertisers seeking a unified platform for cross-channel campaigns | Brands focusing on performance-driven CTV advertising |
| Ad Channelsq | CTV, display, video, native, search, social media | Primarily Connected TV |
| AI Optimization | AI-powered campaign automation and bidding adjustments | AI-powered attribution tracking |
| Audience Targeting | Advanced targeting with contextual, cross-device, and retargeting options | AI-driven audience segmentation |
| Reporting Tools | Customizable dashboards with third-party integrations | Performance analytics with a focus on attribution |
| Platform Complexity | User-friendly interface suitable for various business sizes | May require more hands-on management and expertise |
| Pricing Transparency | Customized pricing upon request | Pricing details available upon request |
If you're looking for a versatile platform to manage and optimize campaigns across multiple digital channels, Basis offers a comprehensive solution.
However, if your primary focus is on performance-driven CTV advertising with advanced attribution tracking, TVScientific may better align with your objectives.
Next, let's explore Simpli.fi, another competitor offering programmatic advertising solutions tailored for localized and targeted campaigns.
5. Simpli.fi – Best for Localized Programmatic Advertising
Simpli.fi is a programmatic advertising platform that helps businesses deliver targeted ads across various digital channels, including display, mobile, video, and Connected TV (CTV).
Unlike TVScientific, which focuses mainly on performance-driven CTV advertising, Simpli.fi offers a broader solution for advertisers seeking precise local targeting across multiple formats.
Here are the few key features of Simpli.fi:
- Geo-Fencing Technology: It allows advertisers to define precise geographic boundaries to target audiences within specific locations, enhancing local marketing efforts.
- Cross-Channel Advertising: It enables seamless integration of campaigns across various platforms, including display, mobile, video, and CTV, ensuring consistent messaging and broader reach.
- AI-Driven Media Planning: Simpli.fi utilizes artificial intelligence to streamline the media planning process, making it more efficient and scalable.
Pros of Simpli.fi:
- Robust Targeting Capabilities: Users appreciate Simpli.fi's effective targeting filters, which help reduce media waste by focusing on precise demographics.
- Responsive Customer Support: The platform's support team is praised for their quick and helpful responses, ensuring smooth campaign management.
Cons of Simpli.fi:
- Reporting Dashboard Limitations: Some users find the dashboard complicated and want more customization options within the reporting tools to better align with specific metrics and KPIs.
- Learning Curve for Advanced Features: While the basic functions are user-friendly, mastering advanced features may require additional time and training.
Simpli.fi Pricing
Simpli.fi offers tailored pricing based on the specific needs and scale of the advertiser.
If you want to know the exact pricing you need to contact Simpli.fi directly to obtain detailed pricing information.
Simpli.fi vs. TVScientific
| Feature | Simpli.fi | TVScientific |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Advertisers seeking localized, cross-channel programmatic solutions | Brands focusing on performance-driven CTV advertising |
| Ad Channels | Display, mobile, video, CTV | Primarily Connected TV |
| Targeting Capabilities | Geo-fencing, contextual targeting, audience retargeting | AI-driven audience segmentation |
| Media Planning | AI-driven tools for efficient and scalable planning | Focus on CTV campaign optimization |
| Reporting Tools | Customizable dashboards with room for enhanced features | Performance analytics with a focus on attribution |
| User Interface | Intuitive and user-friendly | May require more hands-on management and expertise |
| Pricing Transparency | Customized pricing upon request | Pricing details available upon request |
Simpli.fi is an excellent choice for businesses aiming to execute localized and cross-channel programmatic advertising campaigns with advanced targeting options.
Its user-friendly interface and responsive customer support make it suitable for advertisers seeking a comprehensive solution beyond CTV.
Now that we have explored all five competitors of TVScientific, it's time to break down how to choose the best alternative for your business.
In the next section, we’ll go over key factors to consider before making a decision.
How to Choose the Best TVScientific Alternative for Your Business
Choosing the right TV advertising platform depends on your budget, campaign goals, and the level of control you need.
Some platforms offer self-serve tools for quick campaign setup, while others focus on advanced audience targeting and data analytics.
If you need a multi-channel solution, some alternatives go beyond just CTV, while others specialize in performance-driven TV advertising.
To make the decision easier, here’s a side-by-side comparison of the five TVScientific competitors based on key factors:
Comparison of TVScientific Competitors
| Factor | Vibe.co | StackAdapt | MNTN | Basis | Simpli.fi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing Transparency | ✅ Clear & upfront | ❌ Custom pricing, contact sales | ❌ Custom pricing, contact sales | ❌ Custom pricing, contact sales | ❌ Custom pricing, contact sales |
| Targeting Features | Basic targeting options | Advanced audience segmentation | Performance-driven targeting | Contextual, cross-device targeting | Geo-fencing & localized targeting |
| Ease of Use | ✅ Very simple to use | Moderate learning curve | ✅ User-friendly self-serve platform | Some learning curve | ✅ Easy for local advertisers |
| Reporting & Analytics | Standard insights | Advanced multi-channel reporting | AI-powered attribution tracking | Custom dashboards & third-party integrations | Standard insights with location data |
| Customer Support | Good customer service | Reliable, responsive support | ✅ Highly rated support | ✅ Strong onboarding & training resources | ✅ Well-rated support |
| Third-Party Integrations | Limited | ✅ Strong integrations with CRM/DSPs | Some integration capabilities | ✅ Robust integrations with various tools | ✅ Offers some integrations |
Now that we’ve compared the top five competitors to TVScientific, it’s clear that each platform has its own strengths.
Some are better for multi-channel advertising, while others focus on localized targeting or advanced analytics.
The right choice depends on your specific needs, whether it’s ease of use, pricing transparency, or campaign optimization.
To make things even simpler, here’s a final breakdown of which platform is best for different use cases:
Which TVScientific Competitor Should You Choose?
| Best For | Recommended Platform |
|---|---|
| Simple, self-serve TV advertising | Vibe.co |
| Multi-channel programmatic ads | StackAdapt |
| Performance-driven CTV advertising | MNTN |
| Cross-channel ad management | Basis |
| Localized targeting & geo-fencing | Simpli.fi |
Conclusion
At the end of the day, the best TVScientific alternative depends on your goals and budget.
If you need a straightforward, easy-to-use platform with transparent pricing, Vibe.co is the best choice.
It lets you launch a CTV campaign in minutes, without the complexity of traditional TV ad buying.
On the other hand, if you want multi-channel ad buying, StackAdapt and Basis are solid options. MNTN is great for performance-driven TV campaigns, and Simpli.fi is ideal for hyper-local targeting.
If you’re looking for a self-serve CTV platform that’s simple, budget-friendly, and fast to launch, Vibe.co is worth trying.
Check out Vibe.co and get started with your first TV campaign today!
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What are the top alternatives to TVScientific?
Top alternatives to TVScientific include Vibe.co, StackAdapt, MNTN, Basis, and Simpli.fi. Each offers unique features tailored to different advertising needs.
2. Which platform is best for easy and quick TV ad setup?
Vibe.co is ideal for businesses seeking a straightforward, self-serve platform. It enables users to launch Connected TV (CTV) ad campaigns in just minutes with transparent pricing.
3. Which alternative offers advanced multi-channel advertising capabilities?
StackAdapt and Basis excel in providing multi-channel programmatic advertising solutions, allowing campaigns across display, video, native, audio, search, and social media platforms.
4. What platform should I choose for performance-driven CTV advertising?
For performance-focused CTV campaigns, MNTN offers AI-driven optimization, real-time attribution, and automated bidding to maximize return on investment.
5. Which alternative provides robust localized targeting features?
Simpli.fi stands out with its geo-fencing technology, enabling precise local targeting for businesses aiming to reach specific geographic audiences.
6. How does pricing transparency compare among these platforms?
Vibe.co offers clear and upfront pricing, starting with a $50 daily budget or a $500 lifetime budget. Other platforms, such as MNTN and StackAdapt, typically require potential customers to contact sales for detailed pricing information.
